Please or S’enregistrer to create posts and topics.

wlxf Keir Starmer: The potential for change in our criminal justice system is huge

Xcqe Equality gains in the UK risk being reversed by coronavirus, says EHRC
After a year in secure care 105 miles from home, Jack Cavanagh, 17, who has autism, a learning disability and epilepsy, desperately misses his family. They used to see him every weekend, but with Covid restrictions have been unable to visit. As a result, they say, Jack has become more anxious and isolated and recently begged staff to be his mum or dad.His mother Dawn says: He told me you dont get kisses, Mummy, you dont get hugs. She says that staff at Ludlow Street Healthcare, which runs the secure placement in south Wales, have told her that Jack is not alone in asking to see his family. This is happening with other people with learning disabilities due to the separation from loved ones , she says.Separation has always been an issue for those placed in secure care a long way from family and friends. But parents who are fighting during Covid to visit their loved ones say this is being made worse, with more restraint, seclusion and segregation being used to deal with their childrens increasing anxiety.Jack was moved from a special school in west Wales to the residential secure facility after his seizures increased and he began running away.Lack of affection makes [url=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de]stanley cup[/url] Jack, wh [url=https://www.cup-stanley.de]stanley isolierkanne[/url] o also has ADHD, become aggressive. This has led to staff increasingly restraining him, as is legally permitted and a common practice in secure care. His mother has seen the incident logs and staff have told her that s [url=https://www.cup-stanley.us]stanley bottles[/url] ome restraints involve seven adults holding him down for 10 minutes. She says she is aw Tmwl Labour calls for review into police welfare as suicide figures revealed
The supreme court s ruling in what has become known as the Snatch Land Rover cases is an important victory for the families of British soldiers killed in Iraq. But it is far from being the end of their fight for compensation.The families most important success was to establish that the human rights convention applies to soldiers serving on foreign battlefields. Article one of the convention requires the United Kingdom to secure the rights and freedoms of everyone within their jurisdiction .The Ministry of Defence MoD had argued that Iraq was outside the jurisdiction of the UK government. But the human rights court has previously ruled that jurisdiction can exist whenever a state [url=https://www.cups-stanley.de]stanley becher[/url] exercises authority and control over an individual.In the light of that ruling, the supreme court overturned one of its own earlier decisions and previously ruled that [url=https://www.stanleycups.pl]stanley termos[/url] the convention applied to members of the armed forces when they were serving outside the UK.This is an important advance in the law but one that can be seen as the logical extension of the duties on British service personnel abroad to respect both English law and international humanitarian law. If troops have duties, they should have rights.How far those rights extend is a very different question. The soldiers families complained that there had been a breach of article two of the convention, t [url=https://www.cup-stanley.it]stanley thermos[/url] he right to life.This says: Everyone s right to life shall be protected by law. It requires states to establish laws th